Beyond my teaching philosopy of providing a clear, fair and transparent assessment criteria for all coursework and assessment, a number of specific issues provided the rationale for this intervention:
The development, availability and integration of online feedback and assessment tools (such as TURNITIN) into MyPlace offered an opportunity to address the factors above.
Specific success are:
Other coleagues have observed success of this and broader across the department has begun.
Specific lessons include:
Challenges still arise from student invovlement and engagement. A level of familiarity with the software/technologies is required and some students are not as experienced as others. A solution is to run demonstration/training during lectures and to make help guides available on my place. A particular issue still arises from students not engaging with the information provided in advance and in reading feedback afterwards – this can be monitored via the online tools but you cannot compel the student to access the information with tools! There is a requirement to motivate students to do this.
There are a number of technical issues that arose during each year (particualrly in terms of “how do I do this now on MyPlace” following software upgrades…). The first and immediate port of call should be the Learning Technologies Team (Alistair Campbell ext 3770).
This can be applied to any course where there are coursework submissions. Given the broad range of software types that now interface with these tools, virtually any submission type can be assessed.
Class sizes this was applied to were typically around 100 students. The benefits of more flexible marking were immediate.
I would wholly recommend using this approach to feedback and assessment. It is transferable, the only limiting factor is the confidence of the academic to embrace the tools!